Very few asteroids have “known” sizes (or shapes).
Most asteroids have irregular shapes (that is, very few are close to being spherical).
However, the size (diameter of an equivalent sphere) of an asteroid
can be estimated from its
absolute magnitude
H
and an assumed geometric
albedo
.
Estimated Diameter
[[ result ]]
The following table shows approximate asteroid size (diameter in km)
as a function of
absolute magnitude
H
and visual geometric
albedo
.
Please see the text below the table for a discussion on the limitations
of these data.
albedo | 0.30 | 0.25 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.05 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H | ||||||
30.0 | 0.0025 | 0.0027 | 0.0030 | 0.0035 | 0.0043 | 0.0060 |
29.5 | 0.0031 | 0.0034 | 0.0038 | 0.0044 | 0.0054 | 0.0076 |
29.0 | 0.0039 | 0.0043 | 0.0048 | 0.0055 | 0.0068 | 0.0096 |
28.5 | 0.0049 | 0.0054 | 0.0060 | 0.0069 | 0.0085 | 0.012 |
28.0 | 0.0062 | 0.0068 | 0.0076 | 0.0087 | 0.011 | 0.015 |
27.5 | 0.0078 | 0.0085 | 0.0095 | 0.011 | 0.013 | 0.019 |
27.0 | 0.0098 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.014 | 0.017 | 0.024 |
26.5 | 0.012 | 0.014 | 0.015 | 0.017 | 0.021 | 0.030 |
26.0 | 0.016 | 0.017 | 0.019 | 0.022 | 0.027 | 0.038 |
25.5 | 0.020 | 0.021 | 0.024 | 0.028 | 0.034 | 0.048 |
25.0 | 0.025 | 0.027 | 0.030 | 0.035 | 0.043 | 0.060 |
24.5 | 0.031 | 0.034 | 0.038 | 0.044 | 0.054 | 0.076 |
24.0 | 0.039 | 0.043 | 0.048 | 0.055 | 0.068 | 0.096 |
23.5 | 0.049 | 0.054 | 0.060 | 0.069 | 0.085 | 0.12 |
23.0 | 0.062 | 0.068 | 0.076 | 0.087 | 0.11 | 0.15 |
22.5 | 0.078 | 0.085 | 0.095 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.19 |
22.0 | 0.098 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.24 |
21.5 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.30 |
21.0 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.38 |
20.5 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.34 | 0.48 |
20.0 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.60 |
19.5 | 0.31 | 0.34 | 0.38 | 0.44 | 0.54 | 0.76 |
19.0 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.48 | 0.55 | 0.68 | 0.96 |
18.5 | 0.49 | 0.54 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.85 | 1.2 |
18.0 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.87 | 1.1 | 1.5 |
17.5 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 0.95 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.9 |
17.0 | 0.98 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 2.4 |
16.5 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 3.0 |
16.0 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 3.8 |
15.5 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 4.8 |
15.0 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 6.0 |
14.5 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 5.4 | 7.6 |
14.0 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 4.8 | 5.5 | 6.8 | 9.6 |
13.5 | 4.9 | 5.4 | 6.0 | 6.9 | 8.5 | 12 |
13.0 | 6.2 | 6.8 | 7.6 | 8.7 | 11 | 15 |
12.5 | 7.8 | 8.5 | 9.5 | 11 | 13 | 19 |
12.0 | 9.8 | 11 | 12 | 14 | 17 | 24 |
11.5 | 12 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 21 | 30 |
11.0 | 16 | 17 | 19 | 22 | 27 | 38 |
10.5 | 20 | 21 | 24 | 28 | 34 | 48 |
10.0 | 25 | 27 | 30 | 35 | 43 | 60 |
The expression for diameter d
in km as a function of
absolute magnitude
H
and geometric
albedo
a
is given by the following equation.
d
= 10[ 3.1236 - 0.5 log10(a
) - 0.2H
]
The above expression assumes a spherical object
with a uniform surface (no albedo variation).
When using this expression to estimate the size of an object,
it is important to consider the uncertainty in H
(typically 0.5 mag.) as well as the uncertainty in albedo
(typically assumed based on some spectral class corresponding to
an assumed composition of the object - e.g., S-class asteroid
with an assumed albedo of 0.15).
As is evident in the table above, an error in the assumed
albedo
can result
in a significantly erroneous diameter.
For example, let’s say you assumed an albedo of 0.15 for H
=22
but the actual albedo was much closer to 0.05, your estimated diameter
would be too small by a factor of almost 2 (~1.7).