HYPOTHETICAL EXERCISE
This dashboard and the Probabilistic Asteroid Impact Risk (PAIR) assessment results it contains are a product of the NASA Asteroid Threat Assessment Project (ATAP) at NASA Ames Research Center. The assessment was performed for hypothetical asteroid 2026 PDC27 in support of the 10th IAA Planetary Defense Conference 2027. The dashboard is meant to be useful to a variety of audiences with big picture information up front and additional details within the tabs. The scope of the dashboard is limited to population damage from immediate hazard sources (blast overpressure, thermal radiation, tsunami inundation, global effects), and does not include details on cascading hazards or damage to infrastructure. All results and statistics presented are based on the 5000 property samples x 5000 orbit samples = 25 million cases modeled for this exercise.
Date of Current Assessment
1 Aug 2026
Date of Potential Impact
10 July 2038
Earth Impact Probability
19%
Earliest Expected Date of Next Assessment
2027
| Observation Data: | Ground-based brightness estimates, JWST estimated diameter and determined S taxonomy |
| Diameter: | Potential range is 75 - 88 m, most likely in the 80 - 85 m interval, with a median of 82 m and a mean of 82 m |
| Energy: | Potential range is 13.1 - 40.5 Mt, most likely in the 18.0 - 30.4 Mt interval, with a median of 24.9 Mt and a mean of 25.3 Mt |
Asteroid Characterization is based on the 5000 property samples x 5000 orbit samples = 25 million cases modeled
| Potential hazards: | Blast Overpressure, Thermal Radiation |
| Most likely hazard to cause damage to populated regions: | Blast Overpressure |
| Other hazards causing serious damage: | Thermal Radiation |
Chance of no serious damage to populated regions
50.2%
Chance of local (blast/thermal) damage to populated regions
49.8%
Chance of tsunami inundation damage to populated regions
negligible
These results show a Probabilistic Asteroid Impact Risk assessment performed for hypothetical asteroid 2026 PDC27 as part of the 10th IAA Planetary Defense Conference 2027.
Results and Dashboard produced by the NASA Asteroid Threat Assessment Project (ATAP) at NASA Ames Research Center.
Ashley Coates1, Lorien Wheeler1, Jessie Dotson1, Rebecca Bennett1,2, Joseph Mirza1,2
1NASA Ames Research Center, 2Analytical Mechanics Associates, Inc.
| Damage Severity | Potential Blast Effects | Potential Thermal Effects | Fraction of Population Affected |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serious | Shattered windows, some structure damage (1-2 psi) | 2nd degree burns | 10% |
| Severe | Widespread structure damage (2-4 psi) | 3rd degree burns | 30% |
| Critical | Most residential structures collapse (4-10 psi) | Clothing ignition | 60% |
| Unsurvivable | Complete devastation (>10 psi) | Structure ignition | 100% |
The lowest damage threshold tracked is 1 psi, however, lesser damaging effects can still occur at lower psi values. Damage levels reflect either blast or thermal effects of the given equivalent severity. Blast and thermal effects do not necessarily both occur within a given damage severity region
Chance of no serious damage to populated regions
50.2%
Chance of blast damage to populated regions
49.8%
Chance of thermal radiation damage to populated regions
4.4%
Chance of tsunami damage to populated regions
negligible
Chance of global effects to populated regions
0.0%
A single impact event can cause population damage from multiple hazards (e.g., blast + thermal, tsunami + local near-shore, or global + local or tsunami). Sum of damage occurrence probabilities may exceed 100%. A larger fraction of cases may produce each hazard, but do not affect populated regions.
Note that axes are scaled to each plot and differ between hazard types. While a hazard at a given severity level may exist at a certain radius, it does not necessarily occur over a populated region causing damage (compare to Potential Hazards tab).
Note that axes are scaled to each plot and differ between hazard types and severities. While a hazard at a given severity level may exist at a certain radius, it does not necessarily occur over a populated region causing damage (compare to Potential Hazards tab).
| Stat | Serious Damage Radius [km] | Severe Damage Radius [km] | Critical Damage Radius [km] | Unsurvivable Damage Radius [km] | Serious Blast Radius [km] | Severe Blast Radius [km] | Critical Blast Radius [km] | Unsurvivable Blast Radius [km] | Serious Thermal Radius [km] | Severe Thermal Radius [km] | Critical Thermal Radius [km] | Unsurvivable Thermal Radius [km] | Burst Altitude [km] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPDI 68%, Most Likely Range | [36.5 - 48.7] | [18.7 - 33.7] | [0.0 - 12.6] | [0.0 - 0.0] | [36.5 - 48.7] | [18.7 - 33.7] | [0.0 - 12.6] | [0.0 - 0.0] | [0.0 - 0.0] | [0.0 - 0.0] | [0.0 - 0.0] | [0.0 - 0.0] | [12 - 20] |
| HPDI 99%, Potential Range | [23.2 - 82.5] | [0.0 - 39.2] | [0.0 - 22.0] | [0.0 - 7.0] | [23.2 - 82.5] | [0.0 - 39.2] | [0.0 - 22.0] | [0.0 - 7.0] | [0.0 - 15.2] | [0.0 - 8.4] | [0.0 - 0.0] | [0.0 - 0.0] | [10 - 28] |
| Mean | 43.1 | 24.4 | 8.3 | 0.4 | 43.1 | 24.4 | 8.3 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 17 |
| Min Modeled | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9 |
| 1st Percentile | 25.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 25.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 10 |
| 5th Percentile | 31.3 | 9.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 31.3 | 9.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 12 |
| 50th Percentile | 42.5 | 25.2 | 8.8 | 0.0 | 42.5 | 25.2 | 8.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 16 |
| 95th Percentile | 56.0 | 35.8 | 19.3 | 3.8 | 56.0 | 35.8 | 19.3 | 3.8 | 8.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 24 |
| 99th Percentile | 79.7 | 39.2 | 22.0 | 7.0 | 79.7 | 39.2 | 22.0 | 7.0 | 15.2 | 8.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 28 |
| Max Modeled | 94.2 | 50.1 | 29.9 | 10.6 | 94.2 | 50.1 | 29.9 | 10.6 | 21.5 | 15.1 | 7.8 | 3.8 | 37 |
Categories labeled (Severity Level) Damage Radius are the local ground damage values calculated as the max of the blast and thermal damage radius values.
Min Modeled and Max Modeled represent the smallest and largest values modeled (5000 property samples x 5000 impact points = 25 million cases modeled), not absolute theoretical limits.
HPDI stands for Highest Probability Density Interval. HPDI 68% represents the most likely range, and HPDI 99% represents the potential range.
These results show a Probabilistic Asteroid Impact Risk assessment performed for hypothetical asteroid 2026 PDC27 as part of the 10th IAA Planetary Defense Conference 2027.
Results and Dashboard produced by the NASA Asteroid Threat Assessment Project (ATAP) at NASA Ames Research Center.
Ashley Coates1, Lorien Wheeler1, Jessie Dotson1, Rebecca Bennett1,2, Joseph Mirza1,2
1NASA Ames Research Center, 2Analytical Mechanics Associates, Inc.
If Earth impact occurs, the chance of overall damage exceeding certain affected population thresholds is:
>1 person
49.8%
>1k people
38.8%
>10k people
25.5%
>100k people
5.2%
>1M people
0.3%
>10M people
0.0%
| Stat | All Hazard Affected Population | Local Affected Population | Blast Affected Population | Thermal Affected Population | Tsunami Affected Population | Global Affected Population | Local Population, Serious | Local Population, Severe | Local Population, Critical | Local Population, Unsurvivable | Tsunami Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPDI 68%, Most Likely Range | [0 - 4.42k] | [0 - 4.42k] | [0 - 4.42k] | [0 - 0 ] | [0 - 0 ] | [0 - 0 ] | [0 - 30.7k] | [0 - 3.78k] | [0 - 7] | [0 - 0 ] | [0 - 0 ] |
| HPDI 99%, Potential Range | [0 - 541k] | [0 - 541k] | [0 - 541k] | [0 - 954] | [0 - 0 ] | [0 - 0 ] | [0 - 2.75M] | [0 - 1.08M] | [0 - 206k] | [0 - 1.76k] | [0 - 0 ] |
| Mean | 26.4k | 26.4k | 26.4k | 110 | 0 | 0 | 134k | 49.4k | 9.97k | 207 | 0 |
| Min Modeled | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Percentile | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5th Percentile | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 50th Percentile | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 95th Percentile | 104k | 104k | 104k | 0 | 0 | 0 | 608k | 177k | 26.0k | 0 | 0 |
| 99th Percentile | 541k | 541k | 541k | 954 | 0 | 0 | 2.75M | 1.08M | 206k | 1.76k | 0 |
| Max Modeled | 3.06M | 3.06M | 3.06M | 786k | 18 | 0 | 7.91M | 4.56M | 3.62M | 1.29M | 3.79k |
Min Modeled and Max Modeled represent the smallest and largest values modeled (5000 property samples x 5000 impact points = 25 million cases modeled), not absolute theoretical limits.
HPDI stands for Highest Probability Density Interval. HPDI 68% represents the most likely range, and HPDI 99% represents the potential range.
These results show a Probabilistic Asteroid Impact Risk assessment performed for hypothetical asteroid 2026 PDC27 as part of the 10th IAA Planetary Defense Conference 2027.
Results and Dashboard produced by the NASA Asteroid Threat Assessment Project (ATAP) at NASA Ames Research Center.
Ashley Coates1, Lorien Wheeler1, Jessie Dotson1, Rebecca Bennett1,2, Joseph Mirza1,2
1NASA Ames Research Center, 2Analytical Mechanics Associates, Inc.
Top Figure: Average affected population (colormap) for potential entry points along the swath given the range of potential asteroid sizes and properties
Middle Figure: Likelihood of impact occurring within potential impact regions
Bottom Figure (tabs): Average number and ranges of people affected by local (greater of blast overpressure and thermal radiation) or tsunami damage within longitudinal bins along the swath
Average affected population (colormap) and impact probability (bar height) for potential entry points along the swath given the range of potential asteroid sizes and properties
These results show a Probabilistic Asteroid Impact Risk assessment performed for hypothetical asteroid 2026 PDC27 as part of the 10th IAA Planetary Defense Conference 2027.
Results and Dashboard produced by the NASA Asteroid Threat Assessment Project (ATAP) at NASA Ames Research Center.
Ashley Coates1, Lorien Wheeler1, Jessie Dotson1, Rebecca Bennett1,2, Joseph Mirza1,2
1NASA Ames Research Center, 2Analytical Mechanics Associates, Inc.
| Damage Severity | Potential Blast Effects | Potential Thermal Effects | Fraction of Population Affected |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serious | Shattered windows, some structure damage (1-2 psi) | 2nd degree burns | 10% |
| Severe | Widespread structure damage (2-4 psi) | 3rd degree burns | 30% |
| Critical | Most residential structures collapse (4-10 psi) | Clothing ignition | 60% |
| Unsurvivable | Complete devastation (>10 psi) | Structure ignition | 100% |
The lowest damage threshold tracked is 1 psi, however, lesser damaging effects can still occur at lower psi values. Damage levels reflect either blast or thermal effects of the given equivalent severity. Blast and thermal effects do not necessarily both occur within a given damage severity region
Examples of potential local ground damage footprints along the swath, given ranges of potential impact locations and damage sizes. Damage severity levels serious, severe, critical, and unsurvivable shown out to the 50th percentile
Examples of potential local ground damage footprints along the swath, given ranges of potential impact locations and damage sizes. Damage severity levels serious, severe, critical, and unsurvivable shown out to the 95th percentile
Examples of potential local ground damage footprints along the swath, given ranges of potential impact locations and damage sizes. Damage severity levels serious, severe, critical, and unsurvivable shown out to the 99th percentile
Keep in mind that Mercator projection effects distort the size of the footprints near the poles, causing them to appear larger. Click on the footprints to see the damage radius
Extent of regions potentially at risk for local ground damage, given ranges of potential impact locations and damage sizes. Damage severity levels serious, severe, critical, and unsurvivable shown out to the 95th percentile
Keep in mind that Mercator projection effects distort the extent of the damage region near the poles, causing it to appear larger
These results show a Probabilistic Asteroid Impact Risk assessment performed for hypothetical asteroid 2026 PDC27 as part of the 10th IAA Planetary Defense Conference 2027.
Results and Dashboard produced by the NASA Asteroid Threat Assessment Project (ATAP) at NASA Ames Research Center.
Ashley Coates1, Lorien Wheeler1, Jessie Dotson1, Rebecca Bennett1,2, Joseph Mirza1,2
1NASA Ames Research Center, 2Analytical Mechanics Associates, Inc.
| Observation Data: | Ground-based brightness estimates, JWST estimated diameter and determined S taxonomy |
| Diameter: | Potential range is 75 - 88 m, most likely in the 80 - 85 m interval, with a median of 82 m and a mean of 82 m |
| Energy: | Potential range is 13.1 - 40.5 Mt, most likely in the 18.0 - 30.4 Mt interval, with a median of 24.9 Mt and a mean of 25.3 Mt |
Asteroid Characterization is based on the 5000 property samples x 5000 orbit samples = 25 million cases modeled
| Stat | Diameter [m] | Mass [kg] | Impact Energy [Mt TNT] | Bulk Density [kg/m³] | Porosity [%] | Aerodynamic Strength [MPa] | H-Magnitude [-] | Albedo [-] | Entry Velocity [km/s] | Entry Latitude [degrees] | Entry Longitude [degrees] | Entry Angle [degrees] | Impact/Airburst Latitude [degrees] | Impact/Airburst Longitude [degrees] | Ablation Coefficient [kg/J] | Luminous Efficiency [-] | Strength-Scaling Coefficient [-] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPDI 68%, Most Likely Range | [80 - 85] | [4.69e+08 - 7.85e+08] | [18.0 - 30.4] | [1640 - 2676] | [18 - 48] | [0.10 - 2.28] | [22.8 - 23.2] | [0.14 - 0.20] | [17.63 - 18.15] | [40.1 - 46.3] | [-144.3 - -36.4] | [38.0 - 56.8] | [40.4 - 46.8] | [-145.6 - -35.4] | [3.50e-10 - 1.34e-08] | [1.00e-04 - 2.27e-03] | [0.16 - 0.29] |
| HPDI 99%, Potential Range | [75 - 88] | [3.46e+08 - 1.04e+09] | [13.1 - 40.5] | [1279 - 3367] | [2 - 60] | [0.10 - 9.54] | [22.6 - 23.5] | [0.10 - 0.25] | [17.63 - 18.40] | [27.0 - 46.3] | [-179.5 - 20.4] | [7.7 - 56.8] | [26.6 - 46.8] | [-179.3 - 29.5] | [3.50e-10 - 6.67e-08] | [1.00e-04 - 9.55e-03] | [0.10 - 0.30] |
| Mean | 82 | 6.51e+08 | 25.3 | 2247 | 32 | 2.16 | 23.0 | 0.17 | 18.02 | 41.3 | -79.6 | 42.6 | 41.6 | -77.8 | 1.33e-08 | 2.13e-03 | 0.20 |
| Min Modeled | 74 | 3.01e+08 | 11.2 | 1218 | 0 | 0.10 | 22.3 | 0.09 | 17.63 | 25.3 | -179.7 | 5.1 | 24.3 | -180.0 | 3.50e-10 | 1.00e-04 | 0.10 |
| 1st Percentile | 76 | 3.68e+08 | 14.2 | 1348 | 2 | 0.10 | 22.6 | 0.11 | 17.64 | 27.1 | -173.1 | 7.7 | 26.6 | -173.9 | 3.71e-10 | 1.06e-04 | 0.10 |
| 5th Percentile | 78 | 4.21e+08 | 16.2 | 1491 | 8 | 0.13 | 22.7 | 0.12 | 17.67 | 30.3 | -158.3 | 15.5 | 30.2 | -158.6 | 4.67e-10 | 1.25e-04 | 0.11 |
| 50th Percentile | 82 | 6.43e+08 | 24.9 | 2227 | 33 | 1.01 | 23.0 | 0.17 | 18.01 | 43.2 | -81.0 | 46.7 | 43.5 | -80.4 | 5.37e-09 | 9.54e-04 | 0.20 |
| 95th Percentile | 86 | 9.15e+08 | 35.5 | 3082 | 55 | 8.09 | 23.3 | 0.22 | 18.37 | 46.2 | 3.9 | 56.6 | 46.7 | 7.8 | 5.35e-08 | 7.93e-03 | 0.29 |
| 99th Percentile | 88 | 1.02e+09 | 39.8 | 3337 | 59 | 9.54 | 23.5 | 0.24 | 18.40 | 46.3 | 20.3 | 56.7 | 46.7 | 29.1 | 6.66e-08 | 9.54e-03 | 0.30 |
| Max Modeled | 91 | 1.18e+09 | 47.6 | 3686 | 60 | 10.00 | 23.7 | 0.31 | 18.41 | 46.3 | 179.6 | 56.8 | 46.9 | 180.0 | 6.99e-08 | 9.98e-03 | 0.30 |
Property stats are each computed independently. Multiple values from a given percentile cannot necessarily be combined to represent a single physically-plausible asteroid.
Min Modeled and Max Modeled represent the smallest and largest values modeled (5000 property samples x 5000 impact points = 25 million cases modeled), not absolute theoretical limits.
HPDI stands for Highest Probability Density Interval. HPDI 68% represents the most likely range, and HPDI 99% represents the potential range.
These results show a Probabilistic Asteroid Impact Risk assessment performed for hypothetical asteroid 2026 PDC27 as part of the 10th IAA Planetary Defense Conference 2027.
Results and Dashboard produced by the NASA Asteroid Threat Assessment Project (ATAP) at NASA Ames Research Center.
Ashley Coates1, Lorien Wheeler1, Jessie Dotson1, Rebecca Bennett1,2, Joseph Mirza1,2
1NASA Ames Research Center, 2Analytical Mechanics Associates, Inc.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| PAIR | Probabilistic Asteroid Impact Risk, fast running Monte Carlo model to assess asteroid impact risk |
| Hazard | Type or category of effect that could cause damage (blast overpressure, thermal radiation, tsunami, etc.) |
| Damage | Result of hazard (Number of people, severity of blast, etc.) |
| Local Damage | Maximum between blast overpressure and thermal radiation damage |
| Affected Population | Scaled population based on damage severity |
| Most Likely Range | HPDI 68% |
| Potential Range | HPDI 99% |
| HPDI | Highest Probability Density Interval, narrowest range that contains a certain percentage of the points |
These results show a Probabilistic Asteroid Impact Risk assessment performed for hypothetical asteroid 2026 PDC27 as part of the 10th IAA Planetary Defense Conference 2027.
Results and Dashboard produced by the NASA Asteroid Threat Assessment Project (ATAP) at NASA Ames Research Center.
Ashley Coates1, Lorien Wheeler1, Jessie Dotson1, Rebecca Bennett1,2, Joseph Mirza1,2
1NASA Ames Research Center, 2Analytical Mechanics Associates, Inc.